So, best I can describe, a JPG file is to a printed photo - as a RAW file is to a negative. There's more information in a RAW file, making it easier to correct exposure and white balance mistakes.
Today I took the girls outside, and I knew an image I took of Claire would be a great example. Totally underexposed. So here you are:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2ea0/c2ea0f278e9e60ac4f017e800817ef1e987f4985" alt="all"
The edit I did was really fast... so I accidentally gave Claire crazy eyes - but it at least shows what I was trying to say. There's just more information in a RAW file, to recover parts of an image. Here's the finished/less crazy eyed Claire.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c643/3c643f824187328f8db3c123cde4f16839d0ec9f" alt="01"
141 of 365: Hmmmmm
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c42c3/c42c35ba1fca3545c66912f548e840728486584f" alt="141"
Oh and lets take a moment to speak to Olivia. Olivia darling, can mommy take your picture?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/530a3/530a30a6164987a93440fb919372f7ab128d3215" alt="02"
Well alright then.
1 comment:
*DIES LOLing at O*
seriously, I haven't laughed that hard in a while.
Maybe it was your insanely appropriate captioning, as I have in fact said those things myself and gotten similar results.
BTW, I'm currently trying RAW. You=awesome. Me= impressionable. :)
Post a Comment